I.K. Gujral Punjab Technical University Centralized Counselling • Conducted by I.K. Gujral Punjab Technical University (IKGPTU), Jalandhar / Kapurthala
Round 1 (JEE Main Rank) and Round 2 (Board Percentage) Cutoff Trends Across Institutes
Because IKGPTU uses two entirely different merit criteria across its two rounds, 'cutoff' means two different things depending on which round is being discussed — a JEE Main closing rank for Round 1, and a Class 12 Board closing percentage for Round 2.
Round 1 — Top Branches (CSE/AI-ML)
Rank ~1,000 - 85,000
At GNDEC, BBSBEC, top affiliated colleges
Round 1 — Core Branches
Rank ~1,50,000 - 3,00,000+
Civil, Mechanical at wider colleges
Round 2 — Typical Closing %
60% - 80%
Varies sharply by college/branch demand
State Quota Share
85% of Seats
15% All India / Open
| Institute — Branch | Indicative Closing Rank Range |
|---|---|
| GNDEC Ludhiana — CSE / AI & ML | Low thousands to ~85,000 (General, varies by category) |
| BBSBEC Fatehgarh Sahib — CSE | Similar competitive range to GNDEC for top branches |
| IKGPTU Main Campus & Constituent Campuses — CSE/IT | ~50,000 - 1,50,000 |
| Affiliated Colleges — Civil/Mechanical/Electrical | ~1,50,000 - 3,00,000+, often extending to open/no-cutoff in later rounds |
These figures are indicative, aggregated from recent-cycle third-party reporting rather than a single official static source, and should always be verified against IKGPTU's own officially published round-wise cutoff PDFs on ptu.ac.in, which list college-wise, branch-wise, and category-wise closing ranks in full detail each cycle.
Round 2 closing percentages vary considerably by institute and branch demand, but candidates with Class 12 Science-stream percentages in the roughly 60-80% range have historically found workable options at some IKGPTU-affiliated college, particularly outside the handful of most sought-after institutes and branches — though the most in-demand seats even within Round 2 can require a considerably higher percentage.
As with virtually every Indian state counselling system, reserved-category (SC/BC/EWS) closing ranks and percentages are typically less stringent than the General category figures for the identical seat, reflecting Punjab's own state-specific reservation percentages applied within the 85% State Quota.
Because IKGPTU's applicant pool composition (how many candidates hold a competitive JEE Main rank versus how many rely purely on Round 2) can shift from year to year, serious applicants should review at least two to three recent years of official cutoff data for their specific target institute-branch combination rather than relying on a single year's figures.
Punjab's JEE-Main-rank cutoffs for its stronger affiliated colleges (GNDEC, BBSBEC) are broadly comparable to mid-tier state university institutes in neighbouring Haryana and Himachal Pradesh, giving useful context for students considering multiple northern state options simultaneously.
Because both Round 1 and Round 2 cutoffs can shift meaningfully based on that year's total applicant volume and seat-matrix changes, students are encouraged to examine at least two to three years of official cutoff PDFs from ptu.ac.in for their specific target combination rather than anchoring decisions to a single year's data point.
Because several IKGPTU-affiliated colleges have introduced new specializations (AI & ML, Data Science, Cyber Security) in recent years, cutoff data for these newer branches carries less multi-year history than for traditional CSE or ECE, and students should treat such figures as more provisional and subject to change than the well-established branch cutoffs.
Treat every cutoff figure in this guide as an informed estimate rather than a guarantee; the only cutoff numbers that matter for your actual admission decision are the official ones published by IKGPTU for your specific admission year, category, and round, available directly on ptu.ac.in once each round concludes.
Use the ranges provided here to calibrate rough expectations only, and always confirm against the specific official cutoff PDF for your target institute, branch, category, and round before making a final decision.
One more useful practice is cross-referencing a target branch's cutoff trend against that same institute's overall intake capacity for the branch; a branch with a small number of total seats will naturally show more year-to-year cutoff volatility than a branch with a large intake, simply due to smaller sample-size effects in how the merit list fills.
When in doubt about a specific figure's currency, the safest default is always to treat the most recently published official round-wise cutoff PDF on ptu.ac.in as authoritative over any older or third-party source.
Revise chapter-wise mathematical formulas before launching your test: